Urgent Cash Bangalore

Pannunzio pulled by the jacket, that is, the theft of the body, the Italian national sport

one time it was all Cavour, good times, although even then the snakes in the breast, infiltrated for ulterior motives, there were. Then all crispin , then Giolitti, then - you know how it ended for national cowardice - all fascists. Then, Fascism defeated, we are reminded that they were actually all still Crocean. And poor cross is not to blame: the opportunists were his disciples to fake right and left, without so many more ideas. Then again, all Marxists, then all Democrats (including those with the "clip on the nose," as Montanelli ). Now all Berlusconi. Until Berlusconi does not fall, of course, then everyone will say at conferences that they were " antiberlusconiani always, of course." And
Pannunzio , as seen in the beautiful country of 'opportunism mass and gall as a true National mask? Meanwhile, hovered over him for a long time serious clues. For decades he had been worrying the rate of "his" quotes (real, adapted, plausible or false) that could be read in the press. It seems almost alive - remember? - The period in which all said they were fans of Ennio Flaiano and cited to race his aphorisms, or unlikely they were real. Alas, a bad sign: all pannunziani, no pannunzionano .
And what of that 'fake unbearable nostalgia? It seems to read Villon. "Ah, how beautiful it was World d ' yesteryear, that a fine foil for' elite educated and enlightened, well-written, well illustrated ... "What, however, to see the runs, very few of them gentlemen read. Indeed, it is by believing that their conformity el ' insensitivity of many intellectuals and journalists, even the ones that decades later he would be praised with nostalgia, condemned the closure.
E 'from forty' years that certain intellectuals, professors and journalists posing as snobbish " pannunziani " or late " heirs of the World "out of time. Maybe the ones with which the great director of the Risorgimento Liberal" and "World" never had anything to do, or with whom he was in deep disagreement, or even no minimum estimate.
E ' likely to own some of these, certainly a minority, a kind of Nemesis unlike well known to psychologists, for now they want revenge on his "no" to live, to love him by force from dead possession of his body from years calcined to bend - horrible to say - the most ugly designs.
Scherzo, of course, but the thought came to me, as it approaches (March 2010) the centennial querllo true (he was born March 5, 1910) of Pannunzio , reading a few articles and listening some track report of meetings convened with a strange big ahead of schedule (December 2009) in a couple of conferences on Pannunzio , one of which by the Corriere della Sera, Milan. Conferences, from which Pannunzio in life would be kept well away.
But aside from the macabre national sport of "theft of the corpse," I do not want it to happen to the poor Pannunzio what is happening to liberalism in Italy. All praise him, nay, I regret with nostalgia, right now who do not vote more, and even oppose any coalition truly liberal, and even within the various parties hinder liberal solutions. Necrophilia? We hope no.
But I wrote too much, and I would not want those who wanted to be "two lines of presentation" to embarrass the author of the next song. Sull ' anniversary and the figure of' intellectual and liberal journalist, who was also a political malgre soi , was released through the work of the Centre Pannunzio a volume of Turin "Liberals pure hard. Pannunzio and his legacy "of which we give a song like a back cover, signed by its director, Professor. Quaglieni .
NICO VALERIO
.
"There has been a tendency to see Mario Pannunzio a radical. It is true that he was one of the founders of the first radical party in 1955, but it is equally true that in 1962 he resigned from that party under the leadership of Marco Pannella taken Tutt 'other orientation.
Another trend has been to consider the newspaper "La Repubblica" a sort of heir to the "World" Pannunzio , despite many authoritative collaborators of the "World" Pannunzio chose to write about "The Journal ".
A third misconception to be clarified is the result of historical improvised confusing Pannunzio with the ' Actionism [Policy Action Party, heir to some extent the anti-fascist movement Justice and Freedom, sometimes wavering and ambiguous because of its diverse and conflicting ideological components, Ed ] , but that has little or nothing to do with who he was and remained intransigent anti .
was recently highlighted instead the matrix genuinely liberal Pannunzio and coherence that led one of the most authoritative collaborators of the "World", Francis Partner, to define Pannunzio "a liberal pure and hard ".'s liberalism Pannunzio had deep roots that are found in the essay The passions of Tocqueville, written by Pannunzio in 1943.
Pannunzio founded, before the" World, "the newspaper" Risorgimento Liberale "which he directed from 1944 to 1947. On that he wrote many newspaper editorials that help us understand his liberalism. In very difficult year Pannunzio did not hesitate to demand an end to government expression of CLN , restoration of law in the North after April 25, 1945, denouncing with equal courage and drama of sinkholes, Julian-Dalmatian exodus, prisoners italiani in Russia. Il suo anticomunismo fu pari al suo antifascismo .
"Il Mondo" fu il suo capolavoro giornalistico . Le migliori firme della cultura liberaldemocratica e socialista-liberale si raccolsero attorno a quel settimanale, aperto alla collaborazione di molti, ma capace di essere intransigente su alcuni principi e valori irrinunciabili . Ha osservato Nicola Matteucci che "Il Mondo ha rappresentato la coscienza liberale dei problemi del nostro tempo". Anche se i risultati delle battaglie del "Mondo" non apparvero subito, essi si videro molti anni dopo quando i temi impostati dal settimanale riemersero, anticipatory revealing of a culture without dogmatic certainties. That culture - wrote Norberto Bobbio the late '80s - is more at home in Italy today trent 'years ago. The culture that seemed to rock hard, like Marxism, is full of cracks. "
PIERFRANCO QUAGLIENI

Risk Questionnaire For Retirement

The liberal triumph in Germany, just in time of economic crisis shows that

There is nothing more on the policy. All to say that the Democrats swept Merkel. In truth, watching the votes of all, Frau Angela has further reduced its ratings of 1, 4% (in previous elections had already lost 3.3). But the socialists were to collapse in modo disastroso. E soprattutto grandissimo successo liberale (14,6%).
Il vincitore vero è stato, dunque, il liberale Guido Westerwelle, eccentrico e anticonformista liberista e libertario (si veda il suo ritratto nell'articolo di Enzo Bettiza), che ha solo smussato un poco le punte di liberismo economico.
I socialisti, che anche in Germania non hanno capito nulla (il comunismo è morto, ma evidentemente anche il suo fratello socialismo non sta tanto bene in salute), sono stati giustamente puniti. Avevano sostenuto che la crisi mondiale "è la crisi del mercato", sventolando lo spauracchio di un mercato "ancora più libero" con i liberali al Governo. Ma gli elettori were smarter than them. The liberal
Westerwelle had good game to demonstrate the contrary, that the very liberalism, from its inception is the ideology of the rules, and that "the current global crisis is not the market crisis." Indeed, the well-known, severe, liberal rules of competition have been circumvented in the United States and other countries by favors, privileges, tricks, missing checks and angular relationships with governments.
Well, just the current crisis demonstrates, on the contrary, what may happen to the finance and economy when you are away from the correct "market rules" and craftily evade the controls of the body to guarantee preventing consumers, the first real market players, to make their choices wisely.
Therefore, it seems to be saying the success of Westerwelle, back to the free market, but the real one (at Einaudi, we would say in Italy), that really is set correctly by putting all the competitors on the same equal footing, without tricks bag or in banks, and without political favoritism. Only then will the economy and finance can wipe out and punish the bad apples without damaging the innocent citizen-consumers, and even returning to them the role of market players.

Machine That Cuts Letters

... Better late than never. Republicans lose patience on the lack of reform

The letter today that the Republican leader Giorgio La Malfa, addressed to the Corriere della evening announcing the final separation of government and Republicans from the center-right, it is pleasing to all the liberals because it comes after months of illness before the patent inadequacy of this government and populist windbag, as inconclusive on the real reforms that could Italy closer to Europe. Other Gaddafi and Putin. It 'the same La Malfa to list some of the most serious reasons of dissent: the lack of reform (from government to the provinces), the bad economic policy, the lack of state secularism, the ambiguous foreign policy, and so on. We are delighted that La Malfa is meditating now on the "way in which the country make the political change necessary to stop the decline italiano che dura da quindici anni", e ci illudiamo che voglia innanzitutto pensare a confluire in un nuovo, grande soggetto unico liberale, critico verso Destra e verso Sinistra, capace di fare le riforme strutturali che ancora mancano al nostro Paese. Un soggetto del genere, se fosse coeso e comprendesse anche i radicali, darebbe del filo da torcere alla partitocrazia dominante e potrebbe addirittura aspirare ad essere il secondo o terzo partito d'Italia. Riportiamo qui di seguito la lettera di La Malfa (Nico Valerio).
m
Caro Direttore, lo scorso 4 settembre ho inviato al Presidente del Consiglio Silvio Berlusconi una lunga lettera per illustrare le ragioni del mio disagio nei confronti soprattutto della politica Government's economic, especially in this difficult world crisis. Own economic policy was, in the aftermath of the entrance of Italy into the euro, one of the compelling reasons that led me to propose to leave the PRI and the center-left coalition to join the coalition led by Berlusconi. The entry into the euro was necessary and urgent a profound turning point in Italian economic policy for the euro would no longer be possible to protect the country's industrial competitiveness through regular devaluations of the lira exchange rate with which they covered our weaknesses strutturali.Le two lines of the program of the center were the reduction of pressure taxation and liberalization. Given the size of public debt reduction tax constituted a substantial reduction of current expenditure and in particular a contraction of government that stifles the ability of citizen action. Instead, between 2001 and 2006 there has been no reduction in current public expenditure, the tax burden has remained what it was, the project of liberalization that had submitted to the Council of Ministers in charge of the project in Lisbon, was abandoned in 2006 and never ripreso.Ancora more disappointing than the budget for the first year and a half each legislatura.Accantonato ambitious reorganization of government (including the abolition Provinces) to reduce current spending and thus reduce the tax burden, the government has ended up confined to a policy of the day to day. But this does not guarantee all the coupling to the global recovery when it happens, however, because Italy is not sufficiently competitiva.Non we shared the federalist reform of the state from which it inevitably will arise, the way in which it was articulated, new charges public finance. In the absence of a genuine reorganization of the entire politico-administrative machine, promising to devote more resources to the north-central tax together with the need to ensure the South's resources currently enjoyed will surely bring to an increase fiscale.Su pressure deficit or a more political, I have many questions about various aspects of foreign policy, while a long series of mistakes in crisis is putting the delicate balance between the secular state and the Catholic Church that was one of the best fruits the collaboration between DC and secular parties in dopoguerra.Il time within which Italy must change course is getting shorter. The world does not wait for our laziness and our hesitations. New countries entering the market and the spaces in Italy tend to fall because companies have costs, including tax, too high. The school and University, from which innovation occurs, live in desperate conditions. The pension system needs to be sustainable, an extension of the retirement age. Public administration is unbearably large and costosa.Ecco because I have come to the conclusion that a phase for us is closed and you need to open a dialogue about how the country in which to realize the political change necessary to stop the decline that has lasted for fifteen years Italian and prepare a worthy future for our youth. Believe me.
Giorgio La Malfa, Member of the mixed group (Component Republicans)

Disney Cruise Auditions Canada

The tactics of the conservatives. Liberals? Now "victorious" or discounted unnecessary

point of view of Franco Morganti newsletter circulated by the "free society" and by his friend Valerio reported on the conviction that the struggle political act, in Italy, would take place "within the liberal framework." Consequently, if the comparison is between "lower or higher doses to command or liberalization," given that "liberalism has won his historic battle against the doctrine antithetical, that was communism," "For what purpose stand is characterized as liberal ? That is because "spending energy in organizing a political party? What to give Morgan
discomfort especially liberals who are in the PD because it would prevent the confluence of the PD in the PSE, it is clear. That such a belief can be called "conservative" is equally trivial. The Conservative ha fastidio del nuovo, preferisce le strade tradizionali. Non confluire nel PSE è un’avventura per il PD.
Il conservatorismo di Morganti lo rende cieco. Lo scontro politico in Italia, oggi, si svolgerebbe “nell’ambito liberale”? Ma non si accorge della confusione dei poteri (legislativo, esecutivo, giudiziario e mediatico) che è la cornice in cui si svolge l’attuale lotta politica? Ma la “dottrina” liberale – parlerei più della teoria politica che della “dottrina”: il liberalismo non può essere sullo stesso livello della “mistica fascista, nazista o comunista” – non prevede la divisione del potere?
L’Italia ha bisogno della liberal culture, but culture is politics if he wants to take root in the costume and make the "frame liberal" if they play the political struggle. Today is the frame that is missing, and missing for the prevalence of the clerical culture, conservative, socialist and the absence of liberal culture. Hence the necessity of a political subject "of" liberal opponent of the clerical opponents of the conservatives and distinct from the Socialists.
Culture and politics can not be separated, hence the need to refer to the "theory" of liberal politics, rather than a vague "doctrines," materializes in practice for the defense of freedom (singular) of the individual attacked by clericalism, by conservatism and what is left of socialism.
BEPPE Lamedica (Veneto Liberale)

What Is Discharge Like Before Your Period

But a liberal subject is, and how. The Italian political liberalism lacks

the position of Free Society, hosted and commented in the previous article, so answers Raffaello Morelli, the Federation of Liberal . At the core of this position, that is the urgent necessity of a liberal subject as such, that even in Italy to propose and make things liberal, even while the government adheres to this blog.
.
IN ITALIAN POLITICS ALL ARE FREE, NOT ALL LIBERALS ARE
" Free Society seems to believe authorized by your name to line up against the liberals in politics. Express themselves openly, is valuable because it raises a bit of political debate, but the argument only shows the desperation for a drawing fallito.La thesis is the opening of the fortnightly Free Society, written by one of its main leaders, a former Socialist Craxi and never pre Craxi, the top companies in their area is not private, devoted to a life a little snobbishly impolitic never renounce it under the table, which has always moved in the waters of the center left and claimed first and then the indistinct olive the dissolution of the opposition, but to promote a product, the fusion PD, although it was apparent starting in the fate non-genetic root.
The occasion is the desperate cry, coinciding with the start of the conference phase of PD, PD-liberal criticism of the Democratic Party in Brussels at the entrance of the new socialist group, ASDE, reasoned criticism from having understood that this input, despite the contrite caution when conveying the Italian press, means the accession of the Democratic Party to the Socialist trend, partly because those who had come off the daisy by the Liberals, dall'ALDE (reduced to this transfer of the merger heralded as the PD new route). The fortnightly
Free Society blames the liberal-PD by this reasoning. They are as liberal and the liberals have won and now may be the most useful come posizione culturale, si occupino di cultura e smettano di avere altre pretese.
Questo ragionamento già non regge quanto all'assunto di partenza ( i liberal-PD non sono liberali in politica poiché non hanno effettivi comportamenti da liberali, il che è dirimente, siccome il modo di comportarsi è il cuore del liberalismo politico).
Ma da un errore di giudizio, il ragionamento si trasforma in un fondamentale errore di concetto quando nega ai liberali ogni ruolo nell'azione politica ( per farlo giunge a dichiarare che vi sono superstiti liberali nel Popolo della Libertà quando da lunghi anni è chiaro e comprovato che l'affermazione "liberali nel centro destra" è un ossimoro politico: un liberale non può stare in the center right and who is right in the center is not liberal).
leave aside here the feeling (not quite vague) that the fortnightly Free Society implies that politics is power and that the culture they are to be filled, an underlying elite shared only by conservatives and advocates of a democratic struggle. It 'just assuming that culture is important for living together, the cry of the fortnightly free society, the Liberals only deal with culture, reveals something very disturbing and unacceptable to the Italian outlook.
speaking in philosophical terms, if the culture is important for living together but do not deal with politics, the fortnightly free society is in ritardo di qualcosa più di un secolo. Ai primi del novecento venne definitivamente chiarito, superando l'idealismo, che il razionale non è necessariamente il reale e che sono necessarie una serie di altre azioni perché possa diventarlo. Già allora balzò fuori che la cultura ha un senso pratico solo se ha un progetto per trasformare il reale, in altre parole se fa politica.
Allora o i liberali fanno politica come tali (ovviamente non in senso integralistico, foss'altro per interna coerenza metodologica) oppure chi si dice liberale e non lo è (perché appartiene ad un altro filone culturale) non può riuscire a fare una politica liberale, quanto meno in modi efficaci e in tempi minimali. Al massimo può studiare i testi Liberals, to learn, but if it belongs to the liberal culture and its critical sense will always be something else, ready for action inconsistent behavior if not overtly different from lliberalismo.
And since the democratic political conflict and civil trials, the exclusion from the political culture not necessarily the comparison of one party (liberal), his ways of interpreting reality and his plans to transform it (based in fact, for Liberals, on the recognition of the crucial value of democratic conflict). So impoverishes politics and promoted by the government policy. The position of the fortnightly
Free Society does not seem to understand that here is the historical cause hole of liberalism in Italy. The gradual marginalization of political liberalism in the last century, the time of the Royal House committed against Giolitti for entry into the First World War. And not experiencing the issue, the fortnightly would even extend the life by a matter of fact (due to the marginalization antirisorgimentale revenge, ideological prejudices of Marxist origin, taken from the mystical fascist and ogle some theoretical strands with, the lack of professionalism of journalism dedicated to the scoop of the event and the prophet rather than a careful information about reality and its relations) as a matter of principle (contained in the culture and the Liberals out of politics) despite the fact that today the experimental data show that the marginalization of the liberal world has been negative in the evolution of things in Italy in terms of time and institutional environment.
It is not enough. To better support his absurd claims of the liberals out of politics, The Free Society fortnightly try to reinvent the concept of liberalism. This equates anticommunism, trying to exploit the apparent failure of the City. The fortnightly Free Society should be aware that the nature of the liberals is not derived at all from being anti-Communist, but rather is the very nature of liberals that the door to be "even" anti-communist. Communism is finished politically, but not for this is over liberalism, which has ideas and plans for today and tomorrow hard fought by other opponents alive. Under the ideal profile and history, liberalism precedes by at least a century of communism from the beginning and the doctrine antithetical to liberalism and conservatism, that will (unchanged at different times) to change over time the relations of coexistence and power. Marxism is a totalitarian and modernized form of conservatism, where the real master is the conformist state, the goal is utopian (the classless society outside of historical time), the stagnation and misery are the resulting stable reality. All conservatives want closed societies directed by great employees, while the liberal change constantly strives to open the interplay of the individual companies.
Wholesale (thinking to the method of operation and not the model) we can say that at this time liberalism permeates the legal and institutional structures of democratic countries. We must not forget that this is not only the product of the unrelenting liberal pressure in previous eras, but especially that it is impossible to argue that the current legal and institutional settings should remain as they are and that there is nothing to be changed to make the living conditions of the interrelations and open individual and able to address today's challenges of very concrete unfreedom.
The indispensability of political liberals, therefore, remains unchanged even in Italy. The Liberals have a specific characteristic of being the only ones to incorporate in their own way to be two essential skills that are connected to build the institutions: to the center of all policy freedom of each citizen and operational proposals and institutions adapt to the passage of time (and thus the liberals are always works in progress).
The other two do not have these features. The first not because they pursue different objectives, such as statism, class, authority, corporations, religious faith, friendships.
The second because the others have the sole purpose of presenting the models fissi spacciati per risolutivi e non di costruire delle istituzioni aggiustabili nel tempo in modo da rendere effettiva la libertà del cittadino commisurata alle condizioni di tempo e di luogo.
Il non volere i liberali in politica (poiché loro dovrebbero esercitare un'altra funzione) corrisponde all'impostazione di gruppi compìti nelle forme che però in sostanza vedono la politica come occasione per conservare i propri privilegi sociali e non si preoccupano di rispettare i rapporti con le esigenze della convivenza libera (che viceversa i liberali fisiologicamente si sforzano di promuovere). Gruppi che piuttosto che prendere atto del mondo quale è, lo rifiutano e pretendono che la realtà debba essere solo quella che dovrebbe essere jn base their onset (according to them) moral superiority. Theirs is a departure from the elitist pluralist conflict with democratic principles. They take with the Liberals because, being in Italy weakest attack is intended to make tasty, and hegemony, hoping to strengthen it.
And the best part is that these groups are all the more fierce against the Liberals as the Liberals are not fundamentalists, as they do not confuse pluralism with the proportional system and claim as their physiological function innovators while also supporting their positions with regard to traditionally been more attentive to the world social issues, without being enough for the individual issues, and the need to Italy in friendly opposition to form deep in the rule of law. Not wanting
liberals in politics, these groups believe they give more strength to the left more appealing because it is less demanding and more fashionable and otherwise make it even less credible in the public precisely because they feel like something without substance prone vices in the old Leninist absorption of the other for power. These groups say they want to oppose, but in fact, squeezing the Liberals are the best allies of the culture that success to Berlusconi.
.
final two notations. A comparison of all the off-target between the role of liberal society e i rapporti tra fisica e matematica. Non vi è alcuna attinenza. La matematica presuppone la realtà, da essa astrae alla ricerca di nessi e poi sviluppa in via di autonomia logica scovando pure relazioni o interpretazioni che non necessariamente rientrano nella realtà. La fisica tenta di cogliere la natura dei fatti e il funzionamento delle cose formulando ipotesi interpretative da sperimentare. Così utilizza la matematica non solo come sistema di calcolo ma talvolta come spunto per valutare l'applicabilità di nuove indicazioni non solo sperimentali e di insospettate relazioni supposte in ambito matematico. In ogni caso fisica e matematica puntano ad ampliare la conoscenza umana del reale, ma non hanno l'obiettivo di trasformare i rapporti di convivenza tra humans and to establish new criteria for the use of human knowledge for the purpose of individual freedom. Goal is instead the fundamental goal of every liberal policy. Also in physics and mathematics, like that in science, discussion and debate are crucial. I am also in the case of politics but, unlike the political discussion and debate here is not never transcend the logical connections or test results (and by their consistency with the assumptions of interpretation) and based only on those marks for avoiding the choice the mechanics of majority voting also necessarily includes emotional impulses and beliefs, and above all strive not to influence the policy with the majority's commitment to continuous ricerca. Per la scienza ( analogamente che per i liberali) sono inconcepibili criteri egemonici di chiunque. E per simmetria anche l'esclusione di chiunque. Nei decenni, questa metodologia operativa di tale meccanismo è sempre più universalmente condivisa. Nessuno pone quindi il problema di delimitare settori di intervento invalicabili tra fisica e matematica o di reciproca rappresentanza.
Infine fa sorridere qualsiasi liberale l'idea stessa di voler sostenere che il liberalismo ha vinto e che tutti ormai sono liberali. E' una tesi assurda che vorrebbe eliminare il tempo e far finire la storia, mentre è tipico dei liberali ripensare di continuo le condizioni sociali e le istituzioni che regolano la convivenza tra diversi. La presunzione dell'omogeneo is a reliable indicator of unfreedom. Overall, therefore, that the fortnightly free society is a baseless comparison.
The second note is about the random quote at the bottom of the pane of a sentence of a book by Dahrendorf ("people need something more rights and money to live a full and satisfying life. They need to meter give meaning to their life orientation help for their journey "). Submitted taken out of context lends itself to a dangerous misunderstanding. Of course the identity of each depends not only on rights and money. Are just the liberal to say, always fighting against the idea of \u200b\u200bidentity only. That does not mean for Dahrendorf and liberals, it is wrong to engage in the bottom of the rules to promote respect for human rights or to give rules about the circulation of money in coexistence. Policy issues central to a liberal, in Dahrendorf was occupied until the end. Give rules for this purpose is essential because it touches on crucial aspects of individual relationships and being together. Without them we do not build anything for the state of coexistence. But this can never be confused with the exclusion of other interests or activities of another kind in other areas (just think of the vast field of religion).
because the state Liberal non-invasive, comprehensive and prescriptive. Certainly, however, per la stessa ragione, Dahrendorf e i liberali hanno sempre contestato la pretesa opposta, quella di non occuparsi di dar regole ai diritti e al denaro nel segno di valori fuori dallo spazio e dal tempo, che dicono di essere più umani e invece agevolano l'autorità dei più forti (si pensi alla lungimiranza dell'impostazione cavourriana). Allora, se alla citazione si da una lettura avulsa dal contesto, sarebbe possibile anche questa seconda interpretazione politicamente illiberale.
Insomma, è comprensibile che il quindicinale di Società Libera usi le sue notevoli risorse per cercare di propagandare le sue convinzioni. Che sono appunto quelle di una società libera, e dunque di sicuro una società democratica, ma non per questo a liberal society. The liberal society is something much more complex and more evolved precisely because, in every historical situation, it continues to encourage the highest and largest expression differences and individual freedom. And so it is innate and not foreign policy.
In the past decades, proponents of the sun of liberalism rejected because the ideology of which boiled related infrastructure bourgeois class, and now run to theorize that liberalism, as he won, it has become useless in politics. The goal remains the usual. Prevent liberalism in politics to fulfill its charge of active participation, which disturbs the manipulator of the moment and his words Order it used to exercise critical thinking and dissolve (really, not to talk) the concentration of power in order to be with the push to open society. According to this frame, the fortnightly free society will strengthen the liberal idea, but limited and eroding. Looks forward to a free society but not a liberal society.
RAFFAELLO MORELLI

Reason For Lower Abdomen Pain (left Side)

From the "liberal" liberal subject to the new PD. "But if all are liberal, you do not need"

Italy is still, despite the crisis, the sixth or seventh largest economy in the West. But even if it was the tenth or twentieth, so it is now included in the Western Hemisphere based on liberalism as to render futile any discussion of "rebirth" and "reorganization party "of a liberal subject. short, if all or most are liberal, if the differences are only on the degree of liberalism to achieve, that will never be a liberal New Topic?
If you ask a quick note too sharp not to be provocative appeared on the site Free Society, a think tank founded by academic and cultural entrepreneurs who spread the values \u200b\u200bof a free society without the constraints of party. In this sense, dedication to the website close the page "about us" is an eloquent words of Ralf Dahrendorf, "The liberal society is not the prerogative of any political party. It 's a goal of wider significance, and more global. It 's more important reflect on what a liberal society requires more than building a new liberalism. "quote that seems carefully chosen among a thousand, almost as an alibi.
course, but it is obvious to imagine that the English-German thinker to think advanced societies in which he lived, daughters of the Reformation and already fully liberals for generations, not the Western countries on the border , like Italy, that the prevailing tendency toward over the last 90 years of fascist and communist clerics could not strengthen that liberalism elites Risorgimento had managed to achieve. So much so that, despite being bound by an international consortium, still struggles to introduce liberal reforms, the lack of a subject authoritative and credible take on full responsibility. The Free Society
by numerous men of culture from different experiences, from left to right, from the PD PDL. The following article mentions a friend Morelli socialist past, rather than liberal, author of the editorial and then tangled reasons internal to the PD. We do not know or we are interested in these facts. We limit ourselves to note that a naive liberal the Governing Council of Free Society, which was part of the just disappeared Ralf Dahrendorf and which still belongs to Giovanni Sartori, is chaired by Salvatore Carrubba. The Scientific Committee among others Augusto Barbera, Luigi Partner, Dario Antiseri, Raimondo Cubeddu, Giulio Giorello Ostellino Piero, Angelo Panebianco.
If anything, the question that comes naturally is: how do these big names on the conduct of policy Free Society? But at least they read the editorials, like this brisk and trenchant of Morgan? And if so, how can approve? I no chance hypothesis, nor do I conspiracy. But the view suggested by Morelli in response (see) is disturbing. It would be in place, inside and outside the PD, an attempt at normalization between real and fake liberals, with obvious prevalence of the latter? In this case, Certainly, the creation of a large, right, liberal subject, as the third power of critical reasoning, could seriously disturb the operation whether it is the Right of the Left. But maybe it's just a nightmare. Even on this point because little or nothing has come to light in the debate outside. Even Radical Radio, apart from the duty to support Ignazio Marino, it does not mention.
Otherwise, we would not know what to think of so many beautiful and minds of the Directors and the Scientific Committee of Free Society, which disperses at every 'driven by liberalism, and we are sure, sincerely love him, even the claim, but then curiously not want a party that happen. Indeed the exclusive in words nella stessa presentazione del Gruppo.
Immaginate una assise di intellettuali socialisti o conservatori, repubblicani o cattolici, riunita per riaffermare i propri valori con forza, che commettesse l’errore di escludere pubblicamente fin dall’inizio qualsiasi possibilità di dare vita ad un soggetto politico pratico che agisca nell’agone mondano. Impossibile a immaginarsi. Una tattica che farebbe inorridire perfino la più mite signora anziana giocatrice di poker.
E allora è il solito paradosso liberale? Solo i liberali italiani, gli unici, veri illuminati, credono che le idee liberali possano discendere da sole per grazia del Logos sulle teste dei politici, ed ispirarli?
Suvvia, il mondo delle favole dovrebbe be away for these older intellectuals. They may have forgotten the examples of history, namely, that ideas do not march alone, without political support to represent the social life every day? E 'for such errors that the Italian liberalism, one in the West, is sickly, loser, constantly forced on the defensive, more pronounced, which performed at random.
short, the new paradox of Zeno (Zeno, proto, Zanone not ...) is that "If everyone is liberal, no one is." Corollary: "Indeed, no one should be or seem." To resume
abused Benda, if "trahison des clercs" is, well, look at some think tanks and committees scientific "liberals", decreased the number of Italian lay clerics guilty trahison is solid as always well fed and representative.
.
But let the word about the editorial Free Society, signed by Franco Morganti, spread by the Newsletter Fortnight 135, July 1, 2009, and also available on the site http://www.societalibera.org/it/ :
.
POSITION WANTED
"Sure enough - he writes Free Society - after the European elections, there is the problem of the location of the Italians in the democratic European parliament. The latest compromise would be to to see that flow into the PSE in order to change its name to ASDE. This does not satisfy the Liberal PD, ie the liberal Democratic Party and even other liberals loose, as we read the email we receive. But we have not even met the survivors of the PDL liberals, forced to meet in PPE.Crediamo that the problem lies upstream, as was said once, and that the claim of the Liberals to form or be recognized as such in a political party , at least in Italy.
Liberalism has won his historic battle against the doctrine antithetical, it was communism and permeates the legal and institutional framework of all the democratic countries. To what end stand out and be characterized as liberal, when the clash, in the liberal framework, is one lower or higher doses to command or liberalization? It 's like the mathematicians, because their discipline has largely conquered the world, demanding political representation in the math.
What do liberal culture, of which there is always a great need, rather than spending their energies in organizing party! "
Franco Morganti

How Much Can A Man Ejaculate

Populists and without rules. The fake "liberal" regime-eating and all of the "show"

With a clever technique uninformative, Government and People of Freedom party, the entire Right and the Left also tend to spread among people ignorant of political affairs, the concept that ideas, political culture, are now dead, and which serves now the policy of "doing". Doing what, no ideas? Mussolini also said the same words, criticizing the "old liberalism".
Convenient for those who want to make their own comfortable: the doctrines, ideologies force at a certain rationality to a minimum of coherence. And when you do not comply with the internal laws of logic and coherence, let alone the external ones, namely the typical rules of respect for the rule of law, in which even the leaders must follow the laws.
So instead, Berlusconi working only on the words, definitions, on the "show" the theater of politics on TV, can be said to do everything and its opposite, contradict himself within a few hours, defined as "liberal" (What a beautiful word, so people do not know that means ...) but saying things anti-liberal, populist, sometimes even fascist. Or just stupid, which is worse. The duplicity
desired and long study of this right, just one example: it fills the mouth of "liberal" and not adhering to the European Liberal Party, but his opposition conservative People's Party. That alone speaks volumes. But those students will understand the ultra-conservative and ignorant who read only articles and books that confirm their ideas supporters (just go on blogs aggregated by Tocqueville), the ragiunatt, artisans and small entrepreneurs for their admission "does not even have time to read the newspaper, and the millions of housewives, elderly and retired people, who see only the TV, and at most only read or Free Newspaper, and are the natural audience of the People of Freedom? No.
And on this widespread ignorance of the people that is based on right-wing government.
The term "liberal", then, was conquered by his own opponents, as has happened to "secular", now hostage to clerics who act in Parliament on behalf of the Church. Now the commentator Ostellino
Piero, a former editor of Corriere della Sera and secure intellectual liberal school, housed in its entirety in his column in the Corriere della Sera (April 11) point of Raphael Morelli (Fed Liberals and the Committee of Italian Liberals) on little or no compliance with the rules and the anti-liberal populism disguised as "liberal" to the masses ignorant of politics through the mass media, that characterizes this government and also the entire political class. Too bad the title ("Last Mohicans"), of a typical journalist semantically distanced himself and uses the excuse of protecting themselves from a thesis with a certain irony. We know our chickens, having attended editors from his youth.
.
LAST MOHICANS
Ostellino Piero, Corriere della Sera, April 11, 2009
.
This is the story of the 'Italian last Mohicans'. Liberal in politics. Minority, of course. But what became of everything and more, will disappear from view even.
"Dear Ostellino, when in his" Doubt "on Saturday criticized the creature Mr. Berlusconi, instead of the People of Liberty, you use the name of the Freedom Party, a name of the Federation of Liberals, daughter of the old PLI. By itself, the slip shows what brings the campaign, which began in mid-2007 Mr. Brambilla and force Italy to take possession of the mark by a method Freedom Far West media rather than by rule of law. on what is in progress at the Milan court a case brought against leaders of the FDL Forza Italy. But the question goes beyond the law. There are key cultural-political reasons for prevent the theft at the center right of the name that is cheating for 15 years. The same experienced by FDL Malagodi updating the tradition of John and Gary Martin in the wake of Liberal International.
The name Freedom Party highlights the freedom of the citizen inextricably linked to the individual diversity of trends and aspirations, while the people are overpowering and indistinct idea of \u200b\u200bwho loves the team. Join the People's ideas of freedom and is a suggestive image from the political content of all contradictory. It is contradictory acts of the Berlusconi clan. Enhances the adhesion to the European People's Party as if it were credible coupled to the liberal revolution (when the Liberals and Popular are natural adversaries). Organize a celebration of 7000 delegates without voting as if it were a practical implementation of liberal principles (when they are purple). Then, as it contradicts itself, then retry the theft which he had to give to our cause and, with the advertising investment, please try to credit the citizens and opinion leaders at the Freedom Party as his own stuff. So for two months, the Minister Bondi has repeatedly called the Freedom Party which is the coordinator of the organization, and every time you write us a contrite saying that he stumbled into a linguistic mistake. Hence our new case art. 700 cpc to inhibit oversight until European elections. The revival is not Berlusconi casuale. E’ funzionale al disegno di monopolizzare tutte le differenze e ad evitare che la FdL utilizzi Partito della Libertà alle europee. Le scorrerie sono servite ad ostacolare il nostro lavoro politico con altri, proprio sbertucciando e contaminando il nome. Ad ostacolare chi denuncia che il confronto democratico non è riducibile al dialogo di potere tra i due partiti più grossi per mutare regole a proprio comodo.
Questo è il nocciolo politico. Il vero tumore del nostro Paese è il buco di Liberalismo. Il metodo coerente dei Liberali scopre gli altarini, preoccupa e va nascosto. Fanno il lavoro sporco non solo il Popolo della Libertà con i teo-con e il Partito Democratico con il sinistrismo senza progetto, ma tutto l’establishment, publishing and finance at the bureaucracy, are interested in preserving those privileges that prevent the market to compete in the rules. Berlusconi decides that it is neither evil nor care, is a response to the problems wrong and inadequate. The Freedom Party is committed to the area of \u200b\u200bthe Liberals, not the corporation of the populist-conservatives. "
RAFFAELLO MORELLI

Congratulation For A Baby Phrase

Although dogs and pigs, the right-hand scale fails. The PLI is free, and independent

Even radicals in Congress - no more, my lady, of that once - there is much debate, a lot of opposition, as there was in the Congress of the Liberal Party (Rome, 20-22 February). As the good old days. But yes, when there were still evviva, gli scontri forti di idee o di uomini alla luce del sole. Non come oggi, quando si fa tutto sottobanco e in segrete stanze. E però sono tornate anche le "truppe cammellate" visibili, i diversi per facce e vestiti. Oggi, invece nei Partiti dei leaders carismatici senza carisma, sono tutti truppe cammellate, basta vedere una convention di Forza Italia: solo che sono convocati per tempo, hanno i distintivi all'occhiello, hanno almeno letto la mozione, vestono tutti di grigio, e vengono addirittura eletti.
"Bei tempi", quando i partiti, nonostante che al momento del voto apparissero improvvisamente parenti, fidanzate, amici, e ceffi poco rassicuranti del tutto sconosciuti ai più, almeno erano veri, e le differenze Character and world views were not diminished and destroyed the necessary homogenisation hypocritical caesaropapism is prevalent today. So, yes, a bit reminiscent of the nostalgic 'masochists that the political passion was "beautiful."
And so it was in the large conference room of the Hotel-Aran Mantegna. Twists repeatedly, crowd the entrance to the credits, camel fights with the troops of the Right who had been ordered to infiltrate (berluscones? Maybe, those from face and dress seemed pretty Flame! "Exclaimed shocked a girl), a lady of accepting that you are feeling ill, and hardest fighting in the room who remembered the year 50 ("bully", "rascal") among fellow journalists and Diaconal Guzzanti, and one deacon and Brancati.
I mean, who would have thought, the Congress of the Liberal Party Congress was finally a true, some blood, with ups and downs in the pulse-pounding roller-coaster, with a double surprise ending (before the vote on Saturday night, and then on Sunday the decision of the minority in the National Council) that the Liberals did finally breathe a sigh of relief after the controversy the day before. With a first day devoted to political or visiting scholars who have been often true thickness of political relations (in the case of Massimo Teodori), with many surgeries, and with strong opposition uomini. Non di programmi, però, molto simili tra loro, segno d’un Liberalismo maturo e condiviso.
Fatto sta che la macchina da guerra che aveva lanciato una vera e propria OPA segreta e ostile ha fallito. Del resto alcune smagliature si erano già notate nella sua trama: per esempio i pacchi di richieste di iscrizione provenienti da un unico indirizzo, arrivate al PLI un giorno dopo il termine ultimo. Errori imperdonabili che ricordano piuttosto le velleità di Totò e Peppino, e che non possono che concludersi con qualche amaro risolino.
Quello che conta è che il partito di Croce e Einaudi non viene assorbito dalla Destra berlusconiana, ma continua ad essere più vivo e vitale di prima, col triplo degli iscritti (superai the radical cousins), strongly independent and outside of a Right and a Left increasingly sticky, little or no liberal, living with leaders lack ideas, subordination to the Church, reluctance to projects, the modernization of the country and reform, insensitivity to the real needs of the people. And in this, the Right does not seem to have swept the Liberals (unlike those who have lost strategic) way better than the Left. Indeed.
The current Secretary, Stefano De Luca, in two speeches transparencies, the first of which view the invasion was a beautiful essay "identity" and cultural life has been good game to show that creeping Bonapartism uses every means to condition the freedom of citizens, and that - Forza Italy or not - now the right end in the Berlusconi. There is no room for anyone else. Why, then - have asked the Congress - to lead the Liberals right? It was legitimate to ask: "Who had commanded, who would have liked?" But
Taradash and diaconal candidates accused of having launched the bid, have essentially confirmed most of the criticism of Berlusconi. Sign so that if there was OPA, it was not ordered by a secret staircase Berlusconi (let alone a small parties by 0.3 per cent), but rather a spontaneous gift, perhaps facilitated by self-initiative of donors obsequious as dowry to acquire any symbolic role, merits and power. Who? To the right. That, goes round and round, is none other than Berlusconi.
this absurd contradiction (to speak ill of the PDL and then bring in the gift PLI) appeared untenable to better disposed towards the Spaniards, and has done irreparable lose the game in the consortium.
The second mistake, realized on the fly from the audience, as always sensitive to the psychological nuances, was a caricature of arrogance to the captain smashed into one or two characters, and other sharp aggression, a dialectic ruling and spiteful, unbearable didactic tone, unusual among liberals, and among common opponents instead of "opposite sides".
People realized the flight from the tones used in the discussion that what he saw as the "intruders" because they wanted to go into mass with hundreds of new members accompanying him were not to compete with mutual respect and dialogue, but to destroy the adversary and replace it altogether with a coup during the Congress. A planned complete decapitation of the leadership of the PLI. Which will have some faults of inactivity and poor communication, which I always remember, but not certain cultural and ideological, but instead in Italy stands out as the faithful interpreter and complete all aspects of liberalism. That liberalism with which they are abused and beautiful just for propaganda especially Right now anti-liberal in the positions and the facts as or even more than the Left.
Also, further proof that all the clues of which prodest lead to the same political party, has intrigued the fury of an ex-member FI against Senator Guzzanti, who recently left the PDL and just launching serious accusations Berlusconi. On his blog he allowed himself a journalist and "impolitic" scheme out some unorthodox provocations - for example on the penis the major criminals - completely legitimate for a liberal (you know that the Right and Left do not accept personal contrarian positions), and however, has never been an exponent of the PLI.
against him there was an attack of an instrumental Right anguillesca, when you least expect it pretends Left. On the other hand, if you groom in a private correspondence in the Soviet (read all) of our blog, you can find anything. I myself have paradoxical provocations of all kinds. The friend Guzzanti, therefore, was right to complain and denounce "attacks Vishinsky." You have my and our solidarity.
After a long and secret ballot, and De Luca Guzzanti got 73 percent, while the deacon and Taradash 23. The next day, when the National Council and with the prospect of electing the Board, final twist: the losers Diaconal Taradash and refuse to take positions in management.
It is a pity, lawful conduct, but because this non-democratic takeover confirms the suspicions and because it prevents some of the young talented and prepared to work for the consortium of liberalism. The young liberals in good faith are the first to be damaged by deacon. In fact, the good researcher Paul Muccio, genuine liberal who wanted to work in the PLI, however, was ousted from power diaconalina.
The Congress then appointed a new leadership of the Party: Honorary President: Carla Martin, President: Carlo Scognamiglio Pasini, National Secretary: Stefano de Luca, Vice Secretary: Paolo Guzzanti. The Secretary pointed out - is an old and repeated my proposal, and are glad of the victory - un Ufficio di Segreteria. E’ stato costituito da Roberto Petrassi, Mario Caputi, Ivan Uncini e Stefano Maffei.
Tanto clamore per nulla? No, le polemiche e la scalata plateale (ottimo coup de theatre : non a caso con 3-giornalisti-3 come protagonisti, gli uomini della stampa di effetti speciali se ne intendono) hanno chiamato a raccolta i vecchi liberali disincantati, e hanno convinto ad accostarsi molti giovani, sempre attratti dove c’è uno "scontro di civiltà". E così siamo riusciti ad infilare almeno (sono pochi, ce ne vogliono di più e con posizioni ancora più indipendenti, da veri e propri co-segretari) due nomi nuovi, 30-40nni preparati, veloci e attivi, in Segreteria: Maffei e Caputi. Un altro, Tagliati, già lavora bene nel campo della modernizzazione informatica del PLI.
Buon segno: il rinnovamento è iniziato. Speriamo che l'amico segretario De Luca, che così bene rappresenta il pluralismo tipico del Liberalismo, e che abbiamo in modo convinto difeso al 100 per cento, si tolga di dosso un po’ della sua... coriacea sicilianità individualistica e deleghi sempre di più. Il Liberalismo ha bisogno del lavoro di gruppo tipico della politica moderna, della modernizzazione e delle competenze specifiche necessarie ai tempi veloci in cui viviamo. Auguri, Stefano!

Breast Pumping Tortur

Opa secret on the Liberal Party. The appeal of the other liberal postpone the Congress


Coordinamento dei Liberali
Federation of Italian Liberals
Forum for Unity Republicans
.
February 11, 2009
.
Hon. Stefano De Luca
Secretary of the Italian Liberal Party
Via Ignazio Guidi 4, Rome

Caro De Luca, as you well know, we the undersigned groups are committed to building a long time, at the next European elections, the unitary list of liberals, moderates and Republicans who want to enroll in the ELDR Party not recognized in the PPE and PSE. So we believe there will also participate in your area.
press has noted that in view of your congress set 20-22 February, is an ongoing debate among your supporters and others so far entirely unrelated to your party, with regard to your current line of the liberal position. These people would turn it over. Your comparison is well on your location in Italy. Yet we think that, in the natural excitement of congress, the debate would ultimately give a uniform of your company, with unnatural deviations from the principles of liberal political autonomy, which could also affect the question ELDR. This, beyond your imagination, no doubt weaken our list for the European Liberal, by a political propagandist.
For all this, we all turn to you and your party a heartfelt appeal because you want your head off while structural division due to major Italian political issues, and reviewing what has been done by the PRI with the postponement of its Congress in March, want to slip your conference a few month to celebrate the European elections, when your internal debate on Italian politics can be tackled without inducing effects of European election.
Hoping please accept our appeal, I salute cordially
.
Paul ARSENE
Gianmarco Brenelli
Joseph Raphael GIZZI
MORELLI
Pietro Paganini
Claudio Pietroni Nico
VALERIO